지역사회간호학회 홈페이지 방문을 환영합니다.
       
 
 
HOME     Journal    Regulations on the Editorial Committee   Manuscript Review Form

Title:
Evaluation criteria

very
lacking
lacking average superior excellent not
applicable
Research
theme
1. Is the research theme appropriate?            
2. Is the problem researchable?            
3. Is the research theme creative?            
Intro
duction
1. Is the necessity of the research proposed?            
2. Are the problem and purpose of the research specific and clear?            
3. Are the relationship with the main concepts and the preceding studies proposed logically?            
Research
methods
Research
on development or
usage of tools
1. Is the examination of the validity of the tools appropriate?            
2. Is the examination of the reliability of the tools appropriate?            
Research
object
3. Is the research object appropriate for the purpose of the research?            
4. Is the sampling method appropriate?            
5. Is the ground for the number of the samples stated?            
Data and analysis
method
6. Was the ethical aspects considered at time of data collection?            
7. Is the data collection method appropriate?            
8. Is the selection of data analysis method appropriate?            
Research
results
1. Are the statistics proposed accurately?            
2. Are the results that correspond with the purpose of the research proposed?            
Dis
cussions
1. Are the discussions based on the results?            
2. Are the actual results and the interpretation of the researcher proposed separately?            
3. Are the discussions expressed clearly and logically?            
4. Are the relationships between the research results and preceding researches examined sufficiently?            
Conclusions
and
suggestions
1. Are the summary and the results stated appropriately?            
2. Do the research results contribute to practical works, studies, education and policies?            
Others 1. Are the reference materials written in accordance with the regulations? (Refer to the guidelines on the contribution of the theses to the journal.)            
2. Is the English abstract appropriate?            
Pass or fail of the thesis and recommendation of superior theses Fail To be reexamined after revision Can be published after revision Pass Superior thesis
Date     Reviewer’s Sign  

*Please send specific opinions of evaluation in a separate sheet of paper.
Title:
Evaluation criteria

very
lacking
lacking average superior excellent not
applicable
Research theme 1. Is the research theme appropriate?            
2. Is the research theme creative?            
Necessity and
purpose of
research
1. Are the problem and purpose of the research specific and clear?            
Review of the literature 1. Are the main concepts related to the research theme included?            
2. Are primary data quoted mainly?            

3. Are recent books used for reference?

           
4. Is the critical analysis of the researcher included?            
Research results and discussions 1. Are the interpretation and discussions of the research results appropriate?            
Conclusions and
suggestions
1. Are the summary and the results stated appropriately?            
2. Do the research results contribute to practical works, studies, education and policies?            
3. Does the drawing of the conclusions contribute to the improvement in the professionalism of the area of the research theme?            
Others 1. Are the reference materials written in accordance with the regulations? (Refer to the guidelines on the contribution of the theses to the journal.)            
2. Is the English abstract appropriate?            
Pass or fail of the thesis and recommendation of superior theses Fail To be reexamined after revision Can be published after revision Pass Superior thesis
Date     Reviewer’s Sign  
Title:
Evaluation criteria

very
lacking
lacking average superior excellent not
applicable
Research problem 1. Is the research theme appropriate?            
2. Was the significance of the research theme proposed?            
3. Is the research problem specific, and are the interview questions appropriate?            
4. Does the research problem correspond with the research methods?            
5. Was the philosophical stance on the research methods proposed?            

Data

collection

and

analysis

1. Were the training and preparation to exclude the prejudice of the researcher described sufficiently?            
2. Were the data collection methods appropriate? (ex: interview, observation, etc.)            
3. Was the sampling process described in detail?            
4. Were ethical aspects considered at time of data collection?            
5. Were all the processes of data analysis stated appropriately?            
6. Were the processes of data collection and analysis cyclical?            
7. Were there the comments of other researchers and confirmation of the object for the data analysis?            
Results 1. Was the answer to the research problem described understandably?            
2. Are the research results stated clearly?            
Discussions 1. Are the discussions on the findings appropriate?            
2. Is the applicability (to nursing research, nursing education, actual nursing work) of the research results suggested?            
3. Is the direction for future researches proposed?            
Conclusions 1. Are conclusions stated appropriately?            
Others 1. Are the reference materials written in accordance with the regulations? (Refer to the guidelines on the contribution of the theses to the journal.)            
2. Is the English abstract appropriate?            
Pass or fail of the thesis and recommendation of superior theses Fail To be reexamined after revision Can be published after revision Pass Superior thesis
Date     Reviewer’s Sign